Token Runner
TOKEN RUNNER // THE A.I. UNIVERSE EXPLAINED · 28 October 2026

Who's Holding the Controller?

Half of the robot makers' most-watched humanoid videos don't say whether the robot is doing it by itself. None says when a person is steering. When the Wall Street Journal tested a home robot, a person in another room in the building was.

The makers' videos

The robots are coming home. At least, that's what the videos say. The makers' most-watched videos have millions of views. Unitree's newest robot, the H2-X, launched on X this month: over fourteen million impressions.

We read ten of the makers' own videos and what each one, or the maker's own page, says about autonomy. Three say autonomous, all of them Figure's. One, AGIBOT's, labels part of it. Five don't say. One, 1X's launch video, couldn't be checked: it has no captions to read.

OPEN THE INSTRUMENT →

Source: The makers' own YouTube uploads and pages (Unitree, Figure, Boston Dynamics, 1X, AGIBOT, UBTECH), the labels and views read at source 28 October 2026

A frame of the film: the makers' own videos, 14.7 million impressions on X and 5 of 10 that don't say, beside the chart

That is the chart: half of the ten say nothing either way. None says when a person is steering.

What a label is

A label is what the video or its page says, not what the robot did. The five unlabelled videos are Unitree's H2-X launch, three of Boston Dynamics' Atlas films and UBTECH's Walker S2.

The makers do label when they want to. Unitree labelled a post of 7 September "Fully Autonomous"; it just didn't label the H2-X launch. 1X's own post of its NEO launch video has 69,293,417 impressions, and no label in its text.

The Journal's test

When the Wall Street Journal tested a home robot, 1X's NEO, a voice explained who was really in charge: "I am a remote operator in a different room in the building."

The Journal's own narration names him: an operator "with a VR headset and controllers was the one actually operating Neo". Watch: The Wall Street Journal (its own channel), 'I Tried the First Humanoid Home Robot. It Got Weird.', 28 October 2025, at 3:49 (3:49 to 4:00).

A frame of the film: the Journal's video torn out at 3:49, "the one actually operating Neo" highlighted, beside the operator's words, "I am a remote operator in a different room in the building".

The reviewer

Marques Brownlee reacted to the Journal's test of the same robot: "Yeah, all of this is teleoperated." He didn't test NEO himself.

But, he said, the company did label the two scenes where it wasn't: getting the door, and putting away the dishes. In his words, "they actually are very careful to label exactly when the robot is doing something autonomously". Watch: Marques Brownlee, MKBHD (his own channel), 29 October 2025, 4:15 to 5:20 (4:15 to 5:20).

A frame of the film: the reviewer, MKBHD: 2 scenes labelled, the door and the dishes; 7.1 million views; "Yeah, all of this is teleoperated."

What 1X says

1X doesn't hide the person. Its own page: "NEO works autonomously by default. For any chore it doesn't know, you can schedule a 1X Expert to guide it, helping NEO learn while getting the job done." The Expert can "remotely supervise its actions at scheduled times".

Its co-founder Bernt Børnich answered Brownlee on X the same day: "all actions portrayed as AI in the video (text layovers from the AI planner) is 100% autonomous." He added: "We hope to ship a mostly fully autonomous robot in 2026".

Why a person

Why the person behind it? Because that's how the robot learns. The Journal again: "The videos of the robot doing things via tele-operation become the training data to make the AI model smarter."

Watch: The Wall Street Journal (its own channel), at 4:39 (4:39 to 4:50). The Verge heard the same from another maker: Zeroth's CEO said tele-operation in the home will be necessary for safety. Watch: The Verge (its own channel), 'Are humanoid robots the next smart home gadget?', 10 January 2026, 3:23 to 3:56 (3:23 to 3:56).

A frame of the film: why the person behind it? That's how the robot learns: "…become the training data to make the AI model smarter."

Figure's numbers

Figure does claim autonomy, and it says how it measures it. Pretraining its newest model on human video, it says, lifted success in thirty homes it had never seen from 9%, for the same robot trained from scratch, to 56%.

Source: Figure, 'Helix 2.5: Zero-Shot 30-Home Generalization', 17 September 2026, figure.ai/news/helix-2-5-zero-shot-30-home-generalization

A frame of the film: Figure's own numbers, 9% from scratch and 56% with human video, beside its chart

Its words: "Holding task-specific data, architecture, training, and evaluation fixed, Index pretraining alone increased zero-shot success from 9% to 56%." And its own rule: if a human has to step in for safety, that try counts as failed.

The chart is the maker's claim, by its own measure. It is the only one of the ten that gives one.

Figure's caveat

And its own caveat, on the same page: "The point is not that general humanoid robotics is solved."

The rule behind the number is in its words too: "If a human intervention is necessary for safety, that rollout is aborted and failed."

One question

None of this is a trick. But every robot video should answer one question. Who's holding the controller?

Three things to watch. Whether the makers start labelling every film, not just the ones that are autonomous. Whether 1X ships the "mostly fully autonomous robot" it hopes for in 2026. And whether any customer has taken delivery of a NEO; we couldn't confirm that one.

What we couldn't confirm: Whether Unitree's launch film was teleoperated is not stated by the maker and not claimed here. 1X's launch video could not be checked.

A frame of the film's close: half of ten makers' robot videos don't say whether the robot is doing it by itself; none says when a person is steering.

Every quote from the makers' own pages and the reviewers' own videos. Token Runner dot A I.

Sources