Gas power plants are not cheap. They're not going to help you win over the neighbors and community hosting a data center. Most of them are booked out until 2031 even if you wanted one. And as Anthropic noted in their S1, they leave you exposed to gas price volatility. There's a better way: firmapower.com
ENERGY
Nuclear PPAs, data-centre megawatts, grid constraints, utility deals
DATA • CONVERSATIONS • SIGNALS • HUMANS • VIDEOS

Interlinked
Data
The rows behind this figure: the US household price of electricity, by month
The table is read from the same data file as the chart when this section is opened.
All Interlinked: Energy
Conversations
The biggest conversational points among Energy’s tracked accounts and searches since 2026-10-25: 61 posts read, 7 kept, 43 dropped as not about AI, 4 dropped as only a link, 5 dropped as a promotion, 2 dropped as a reply to a reply. The posts are their authors’ own words; the rule under each pick says why it stands here.
1. power
3 accounts · 4 posts · engagement 290 · the point they share: a lane term several carry
Why this post
the most engaged post of @JesseJenkins in this conversation (104 likes, 20 reposts, 1 quotes, 8 replies as read); the point: a lane term several carry (power); from the lane
To overcome grid connection delays, data centre developers are pushing forward projects with onsite natural gas-based power generation
But with most centres still aiming to connect to the grid in the long-term, addressing bottlenecks remains crucial 👉 iea.li/3Qf9zxV pic.x.com/X6J9XgkkTh
Why this post
the most engaged post of @IEA in this conversation (23 likes, 4 reposts, 1 quotes, 7 replies as read); the point: a lane term several carry (power); from the lane
Workload requirements. Climate conditions. Power and water availability. Each can influence the cooling approach as AI rack densities increase. Join George Hannah and Maurizio Frizziero on November 9 at 10:00 a.m. EST: ms.spr.ly/6016aaSx4
#ThermalManagement pic.x.com/gMWMM0CJ45
Why this post
the most engaged post of @Vertiv in this conversation (8 likes, 0 reposts, 0 quotes, 1 replies as read); the point: a lane term several carry (power); from the lane
2. energy
2 accounts · 2 posts · engagement 72 · the point they share: a lane term several carry
AI is becoming dramatically more energy efficient. At the same time, electricity demand from data centres is set to surge. How can both be true?
Watch as IEA experts unpack this question – and discuss what AI means for the energy system more broadly 👉 iea.li/4bvR3Jn pic.x.com/5vBWgEpZnW
Why this post
the most engaged post of @IEA in this conversation (30 likes, 7 reposts, 3 quotes, 6 replies as read); the point: a lane term several carry (energy); from the lane
As data center infrastructure expands, engineering decisions play an important role in how energy, water, and other resources are managed. This #SustainabilityDay, learn how Vertiv approaches responsible growth through the One Vertiv, One World framework: ms.spr.ly/6011aLfoT pic.x.com/LoWYzejUA5
Why this post
the most engaged post of @Vertiv in this conversation (8 likes, 0 reposts, 0 quotes, 1 replies as read); the point: a lane term several carry (energy); from the lane
The posts our Energy pieces quoted
Not a feed. Each with the piece that used it.
Falling costs are driving rapid growth in battery markets – with average prices dropping 8% in 2025.
But regional price disparities are widening: battery packs in China were 30% cheaper than in the US & 35% cheaper than in Europe last year.
Read more 👉 https://t.co/fRDiu5lrpx https://t.co/sWuURw6hHB
Quoted in The Cell
AI is getting cheaper more quickly than any other transformative tech in history. At a given level of performance, cost has fallen ~47%/quarter since 2023.
That’s 4× faster than DNA sequencing, 6× faster than compute, 18× faster than lithium batteries, and (up to 1973) 54× faster than electricity.
Quoted in The Cell
Signals
The filings, reports and news stories behind the Energy pieces, as each piece cites them. A document two pieces cite shows twice.
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, Average Price Data, series APU000072610, "Electricity per KWH in U.S. city average", read through the BLS public API v2 on 27 October 2026: 93 monthly observations from January 2019 to September 2026, in dollars per kilowatt-hour; August 2026 0.196, September 2026 0.196, August 2019 0.139. The viral post's 19.6 cents is this series' August 2026 figure. the source ↗cited in Right Number, Wrong Blame
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, "CPI: Average Price Data" (factsheet): "Specifically, average prices are estimates of the average price paid by the consumer for a good or service."; "Average prices are estimated from a subset of CPI data"; "the CPI sample is optimized for the calculation of price indexes, not for the calculation of average prices."; "Electricity prices are reported in kilowatt hours (kwh)." the source ↗cited in Right Number, Wrong Blame
- Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.3, "Average Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers: Total by End-Use Sector, 2016 - August 2026 (Cents per Kilowatthour)", read 27 October 2026. Residential, annual: 2019 13.01; 2020 13.15; 2021 13.66; 2022 15.04; 2023 16.00; 2024 16.48; 2025 17.23; 2026 year to date (January to August) 18.19. Residential, August 2026: 18.16; August 2025: 17.57. "Values for 2025 and prior years are final."; "Values for 2026 are preliminary estimates based on a cutoff model sample."; source Form EIA-861M. the source ↗cited in Right Number, Wrong Blame
- Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.A, "Average Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector, by State, August 2026 and 2025 (Cents per Kilowatthour)", residential, read 27 October 2026: Maine 32.11 (August 2025: 28.14); California 29.75 (30.92); New York 28.65 (26.64); U.S. total 18.16 (17.57). "Values for 2025 are final. Values for 2026 are preliminary estimates based on a cutoff model sample." the source ↗cited in Right Number, Wrong Blame
- Energy Information Administration, API v2, electricity/retail-sales, residential average price by state and for the U.S. total, monthly, as the pipeline's own record of 19 October 2026 holds it (data through July 2026): August 2019, Maine 17.92, California 19.78, New York 18.38, U.S. total 13.30 cents per kilowatt-hour; the U.S. residential series January 2019 to July 2026 drawn in the first chart. the source ↗cited in Right Number, Wrong Blame
- Energy Information Administration, Glossary, "Average revenue per kilowatthour": "The average revenue per kilowatthour of electricity sold by sector (residential, commercial, industrial, or other) and geographic area (State, Census division, and national) is calculated by dividing the total monthly revenue by the corresponding total monthly sales for each sector and geographic area." the source ↗cited in Right Number, Wrong Blame
- Our World in Data, Price of lithium-ion battery cells, 9 October 2026 data collectioncited in The Cell
- Our World in Data, the chart's metadata and the processing code for "Historical battery costs and production", read 9 October 2026cited in The Cell
- BloombergNEF, press release, "Lithium-ion Battery Pack Prices Rise for First Time to an Average of $151/kWh", 6 December 2022cited in The Cell
- BloombergNEF, press release, "Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Prices Hit Record Low of $139/kWh", 27 November 2023cited in The Cell
- BloombergNEF, press release, "Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Prices See Largest Drop Since 2017, Falling to $115 per Kilowatt-Hour", 10 December 2024cited in The Cell
- BloombergNEF, press release, "Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Prices Fall to $108 Per Kilowatt-Hour, Despite Rising Metal Prices", 9 December 2025cited in The Cell
- International Energy Agency, Global EV Outlook 2023, "Trends in batteries"cited in The Cell
- International Energy Agency, commentary, "Global battery markets are growing strongly – and so are the supply risks", Teo Lombardo, Leonardo Paoli, Araceli Fernandez Pales and Timur Gül, 13 February 2026cited in The Cell
- Canary Media, "Chart: Lithium-ion battery prices fall yet again", Dan McCarthy, 13 December 2024cited in The Cell
- X posts: International Energy Agency, 30 September 2026; Epoch AI, 22 September 2026cited in The Cell
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, average retail price of electricity by sector and by state, monthly; Token Runner's collection of 9 October 2026, July 2026 the latest monthcited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Epoch AI, the data centres file, as Token Runner collected it on 9 October 2026 (and on 2 October 2026, the collection the film was made with)cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Our World in Data, carbon intensity of electricity generation; Token Runner's collection of 9 October 2026cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- PJM Interconnection, 'PJM Capacity Auction Procures 138,318 MW of Generation Resources as Work Continues To Address Growing Electricity Demand', PJM Inside Lines, 14 July 2026, read 2 October and 10 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Cathy Kunkel, 'Projected data center growth spurs PJM capacity prices by factor of 10', Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, 30 July 2025, read 2 October and 10 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Wiser and others (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) with Hledik and others (The Brattle Group), 'Factors Influencing Recent Trends in Retail Electricity Prices in the United States', October 2025, read 2 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Electric Power Research Institute (Watten, Bistline, Blanford), 'Have Data Centers Raised Your Electric Bill?', a brief of the 2026 white paper of the same name, read 2 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Watten, Bistline and Blanford (Electric Power Research Institute), 'Have Data Centers Raised Your Electric Bill? Causal Evidence from the United States', arXiv:2606.19777 v1, submitted 18 June 2026 (a preprint), read 2 October and 10 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Kiran Garimella, 'Do Data Centers Raise Residential Electricity Prices? Evidence from 24 U.S. States', a preliminary draft on the author's own site, June 2026, the abstract read 2 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Golden and others, 'Certificates without Electrons? Theory and Evidence on Impacts from AI-Driven Power Demand', arXiv:2606.00811 v2, 2 August 2026 (a preprint), the abstract read 2 October and 10 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, 119th Congress: as introduced, 18 June 2026: ; as passed by the House, 16 September 2026, read 10 October 2026: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119hr9340eh/html/BILLS-119hr9340eh.htm the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- House Report 119-814, the committee's report on H.R. 9340, 10 September 2026, read 2 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives, Roll Call 312, 16 September 2026, read 10 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- American Public Power Association, 'Ratepayer Protection Act is Blocked in Senate', read 10 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- American Public Power Association, 'FERC Accepts PJM Proposed Reliability Backstop Procurement, But Suspends It for Five Months', read 10 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Edison Electric Institute, 'America's Electric Companies Protect Customers by Ensuring Data Centers Pay Their Fair Share', 15 September 2026, read 2 October and 10 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
- Office of the Governor of North Carolina, 'Governor Stein's Energy Policy Task Force Releases Interim Report', 16 February 2026, read 2 October and 10 October 2026 the source ↗cited in Who Pays for the Power?
Humans
The people of the 2026 Replicants list who sit in Energy: 1, by rank. A card opens the person on the Replicants page.


